Discussion:
[Wien] About mBJ convergence
Muhammad Sajjad
2013-09-07 13:29:42 UTC
Permalink
Dear Users

I have question about mBJ calculations. When we execute
scf calculations with LSDA (or other functionals) then mostly over
calculation finishes with in 30 iterations. But when we apply mBJ over it,
then it finishes about 250 iterations. Is this going fine? I mean results
obtained are correct? I am doing this on Wien2k12.1 version, and running
the mBJ calculations with the method given in user guide. In case.inm file
I switches MRSI to PRAAT and mixing factor to 0.1? my case is
spin-polarized and sometimes with in 60 iterations the charge is converged.

please guide me in this regard.

With thanks

M. Sajjad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130907/00da6b86/attachment.htm>
okoyecmi
2013-09-07 13:36:50 UTC
Permalink
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
Muhammad Sajjad
2013-09-08 16:44:05 UTC
Permalink
Dear Okoye
Thank you for your suggestion, I have tried this already and repeated it
again with mixing factor 0.3, but the problem is still there. Any other
suggestion Okoye and other Wien2k users please?

Regards
Post by okoyecmi
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf
cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130909/129a5197/attachment.htm>
Laurence Marks
2013-09-08 16:47:56 UTC
Permalink
With the older mixer, to start mBJ going it was best to run some
cycles with 0.1 and PRATT first, then switch to MSR1.

With the current mixer this should be better, perhaps sometimes you
might also want to start with a few (5-10) PRATT steps.

In general MSR1 converges much better.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Okoye
Thank you for your suggestion, I have tried this already and repeated it
again with mixing factor 0.3, but the problem is still there. Any other
suggestion Okoye and other Wien2k users please?
Regards
Post by okoyecmi
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf
cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
<wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
Muhammad Sajjad
2013-09-08 17:09:50 UTC
Permalink
I have done the first job with mixing factor 0.1 and PRATT then switched to
MSRI, it also takes about 160 iterations. I will try your second suggested
job. Can you tell me please that after how many iterations, the convergence
is considered to be good?

Thanks and True regards
Post by Laurence Marks
With the older mixer, to start mBJ going it was best to run some
cycles with 0.1 and PRATT first, then switch to MSR1.
With the current mixer this should be better, perhaps sometimes you
might also want to start with a few (5-10) PRATT steps.
In general MSR1 converges much better.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Okoye
Thank you for your suggestion, I have tried this already and repeated it
again with mixing factor 0.3, but the problem is still there. Any other
suggestion Okoye and other Wien2k users please?
Regards
Post by okoyecmi
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf
cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
<wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130909/e9da8668/attachment.htm>
Laurence Marks
2013-09-08 18:27:44 UTC
Permalink
With no information nobody can tell you anything useful.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
I have done the first job with mixing factor 0.1 and PRATT then switched to
MSRI, it also takes about 160 iterations. I will try your second suggested
job. Can you tell me please that after how many iterations, the convergence
is considered to be good?
Thanks and True regards
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Laurence Marks <L-marks at northwestern.edu>
Post by Laurence Marks
With the older mixer, to start mBJ going it was best to run some
cycles with 0.1 and PRATT first, then switch to MSR1.
With the current mixer this should be better, perhaps sometimes you
might also want to start with a few (5-10) PRATT steps.
In general MSR1 converges much better.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Okoye
Thank you for your suggestion, I have tried this already and repeated it
again with mixing factor 0.3, but the problem is still there. Any other
suggestion Okoye and other Wien2k users please?
Regards
Post by okoyecmi
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf
cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
<wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
Muhammad Sajjad
2013-09-09 04:06:33 UTC
Permalink
Thank you Laurence, it is working now. I am dealing two cases and both of
your suggestions working.

Regards
Post by Laurence Marks
With no information nobody can tell you anything useful.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
I have done the first job with mixing factor 0.1 and PRATT then switched
to
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
MSRI, it also takes about 160 iterations. I will try your second
suggested
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
job. Can you tell me please that after how many iterations, the
convergence
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
is considered to be good?
Thanks and True regards
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Laurence Marks <
L-marks at northwestern.edu>
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by Laurence Marks
With the older mixer, to start mBJ going it was best to run some
cycles with 0.1 and PRATT first, then switch to MSR1.
With the current mixer this should be better, perhaps sometimes you
might also want to start with a few (5-10) PRATT steps.
In general MSR1 converges much better.
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Okoye
Thank you for your suggestion, I have tried this already and repeated
it
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by Laurence Marks
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
again with mixing factor 0.3, but the problem is still there. Any
other
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by Laurence Marks
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
suggestion Okoye and other Wien2k users please?
Regards
Post by okoyecmi
I think you should increase the mixing factor after some initial scf
cycles. This is contained in the UG.
Regards
C M I Okoye
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammad Sajjad <sajjadpu at gmail.com>
Sender: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:29:42
To: wien<Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
<wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] About mBJ convergence
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by Laurence Marks
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by okoyecmi
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Post by Muhammad Sajjad
Post by Laurence Marks
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu 1-847-491-3996
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what
nobody else has thought"
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20130909/7ab6b508/attachment.htm>
Loading...